[Pdns-users] TinyDNS backend for PowerDNS

bert hubert bert.hubert at netherlabs.nl
Mon Mar 17 19:28:10 UTC 2008


On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 08:20:51AM -0700, Brad Dameron wrote:
> I am currently converting to PDNS from BIND9. I have zone files ranging in
> the 32+ MB range. Do people suggest using the BIND backend or using the
> MySQL one? I am looking at doing a SuperMaster that updates 4 slave
> servers. 2 servers in each location are behind a hardware load balancer.

MySQL is probably best for these replication volumes. SuperMaster
replication relies on very good communications between master and slave at
all times, otherwise new zones on the master may be missed on the slaves.

Alternatively, 32+MB zones smell like in-addr.arpa zones with a million
entries. Quite a number of PowerDNS users have had great results with
running a dedicated 'pipe' backend that generates reverse mappings on the
fly.

This might save you quite some headaches.

Please let us know!

	Bert


>  
> Thanks,
> Brad Dameron
> Clearw're
> Senior Systems Engineer
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> From: pdns-users-bounces at mailman.powerdns.com on behalf of Duane
> Sent: Sat 3/15/2008 4:21 PM
> To: pdns-users
> Subject: Re: [Pdns-users] TinyDNS backend for PowerDNS
> 
> 
> 
> bert hubert wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 12:52:21AM +1100, Duane wrote:
> >>> I'm unhappy it doesn't match your needs though, but perhaps you want
> >>> something else. Basically you get a lot of ANY queries, instead of queries
> >>> for the exact type requested. This turns out to be a large speedup, but it
> >>> may hurt you.
> >> We mostly get NAPTR requests, so yes, that was a bit of a problem for us.
> >
> > But is answering NAPTR requests to ANY backend queries such a problem? It
> > never has been for other backends.
> 
> We're using the bind backend atm, although that has some down sides as well.
> 
> How many others have attempted to build a backend that could handle 18M
> (and growing) of zone data?
> 
> Our criteria is a little different to most doing anything close to the
> same thing we are due to the fact we're non-profit, so there is less
> resources then commercial ventures doing the same.
> 
> --
> 
> Best regards,
>  Duane
> 
> http://www.freeauth.org <http://www.freeauth.org/>  - Enterprise Two Factor Authentication
> http://www.nodedb.com <http://www.nodedb.com/>  - Think globally, network locally
> http://www.sydneywireless.com <http://www.sydneywireless.com/>  - Telecommunications Freedom
> http://e164.org <http://e164.org/>  - Because e164.arpa is a tax on VoIP
> 
> "In the long run the pessimist may be proved right,
>     but the optimist has a better time on the trip."
> _______________________________________________
> Pdns-users mailing list
> Pdns-users at mailman.powerdns.com
> http://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users
> 
> 
> 
> 
> !DSPAM:47de8e3e200181967915364!

> _______________________________________________
> Pdns-users mailing list
> Pdns-users at mailman.powerdns.com
> http://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users
> 
> 
> !DSPAM:47de8e3e200181967915364!


-- 
http://www.PowerDNS.com      Open source, database driven DNS Software 
http://netherlabs.nl              Open and Closed source services


More information about the Pdns-users mailing list