[Pdns-users] SERIAL in SOA 2147483649 !!!!!
andreas at j8.com.ru
Wed Sep 29 21:12:25 UTC 2004
Wednesday, September 29, 2004, 9:39:08 PM, you wrote:
HK> On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 18:13:24 +0400, Andreas <andreas at j8.com.ru> wrote:
>>again I rise this question for our developer!
>>In BIND the serial in SOA is UNSIGNED INT!
>>But in our lovely PDNS it is NOT UNSIGNED! BUT SIGNED! So i have trouble with increment
HK> it's been discussed here several times and a bug-ticket is open here.
HK> problem: the bugfix is not sooo easy to implement (as I understand it)
HK> I guess you'll have to take the ugly way to reduce your serial to "0" (or
HK> similar) and wait for the world's caching nameservers to timeout with your old
HK> entries - just make sure your own slave-servers at least are forced to load the
HK> new zone containing a minor-serial.
HK> btw. by using the suggested YYYYMMDDnn format you'd never had this kind of
no problems if nn in YYYYMMDDnn <99 !!!
but if i can reload more then 99 time per day ?
HK> Pdns-users mailing list
HK> Pdns-users at mailman.powerdns.com
Thursday, September 30, 2004 1:11:39 AM Andreas at j8.com.ru
More information about the Pdns-users