[Pdns-users] BIND-Zonefiles: @ vs blank
Brian Candler
b.candler at pobox.com
Thu Aug 8 14:19:42 UTC 2019
On 08/08/2019 14:09, Michael Loftis wrote:
>
> we have a zonefile which got recently added TXT entries for SPF
> and DMARC:
>
> _dmarc IN TXT "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:foo
> <mailto:foo>"
> IN MX 10 mx.domain.tld.
> IN TXT "v=spf1 include:spf1.domain.tld ?all"
>
> Since then, requests for the MX record were not answered any more,
> adding a @ fixed it.
>
> I'm wondering now why this happens, as in other zonefiles without TXT
> records the blank substitution works.
>
>
> I've always had the understanding that blank meant "reuse last" so by
> adding the _dmarc TXT record ahead of the blank records you
> inadvertently moved them to be _dmarc.ZONE
You are correct. All three records shown above are for _dmarc.ZONE
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.powerdns.com/pipermail/pdns-users/attachments/20190808/9ecaccfb/attachment.html>
More information about the Pdns-users
mailing list