[Pdns-users] Re: SPF

[Hugo van der Kooij]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Julian Mehnle wrote:
| marty wrote:
|> The SPF rr is still not very well supported and few servers support it.
|> Dig seems to bork the SPF type pretty badly.
|> [...]
|> PDNS seems to serve this record, but I get a mess when I try to access
|> it with dig. Otherwise, other compatable testing tools said it was
|> working and valid, and displayed the record which matched my TXT record
|> exactly.
|
| You need a sufficiently recent version of dig.  It supports SPF-type RRs
| starting with 9.4:

It just happens to be a TXT record. So why not just dig for that? That
worked from day 0 of the SPF records.

Hugo.

- --
hvdkooij at vanderkooij.org               http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/
PGP/GPG? Use: http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/0x58F19981.asc

	A: Yes.
	>Q: Are you sure?
	>>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
	>>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?

Bored? Click on http://spamornot.org/ and rate those images.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFIeHMIBvzDRVjxmYERAgsHAJkB9L01GmhcadzPRGUgdhLBlwSsAwCgmrEW
YQDF1axcXUU8C/5w5idRx5w=
=TUDW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----