[Pdns-users] pdns-recursor performance
Leen Besselink
leen at wirehub.nl
Tue Aug 5 08:44:19 UTC 2008
On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 10:29:14AM +0200, Leen Besselink wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 12:30:25AM -0700, Brad Dameron wrote:
> > And you will see your response times drop from 1-2 seconds to milliseconds. I did a lot of testing of this and pdns-recursor is definitely the best out there.
> >
> > Brad
> >
>
> Hi Brad,
>
> Did you also test Unbound ( www.unbound.net ) ?
>
> They say they are faster, they are a fairly new player in this field (version 1.0.0 released May 20, 2008).
>
> I can't find the graph. The graph I've seen shows PowerDNS and bind pretty
> close together. Which I found a bit strange.
>
I did find the graphs:
http://www.unbound.net/documentation/ripe56_unbound_02.pdf
> Even if they are faster, atleast they are keeping the title in the Netherlands
> (PowerDNS and NLNetlabs are both dutch organisations). :-)
>
> I've not used/tested it.
More information about the Pdns-users
mailing list