[Pdns-users] Rdns Delegate @ Ripe

Rutger rutgermm at xs4all.nl
Thu Nov 24 09:39:23 UTC 2005


> Hi,
>
> Am Donnerstag, den 24.11.2005, 09:30 +0100 schrieb Rutger:
>
>> What I get here is:
>>
>> > 21.109.194.in-addr.arpa.
>> Server:  ns.xs4all.nl
>> Address:  194.109.6.67
>>
>> 21.109.194.in-addr.arpa
>>         primary name server = ns.xs4all.nl
>>         responsible mail addr = hostmaster.xs4all.nl
>>         serial  = 2005100600
>>         refresh = 21600 (6 hours)
>>         retry   = 7200 (2 hours)
>>         expire  = 604800 (7 days)
>>         default TTL = 86400 (1 day)
>>
>>
>> OK, I'm missing these lines at my nslookup:
>>
>> 21.109.194.in-addr.arpa nameserver = ns.xs4all.nl
>> 21.109.194.in-addr.arpa nameserver = ns2.xs4all.nl
>> ns.xs4all.nl    internet address = 194.109.6.67
>> ns2.xs4all.nl   internet address = 194.109.9.100
>>
>> It looks like they are in the SOA-record but that is not possible off
>> course. I was reading some documentation
>> (http://www.tac.nyc.ny.us/cgi-bin/rfc?2317) about this and I think I
>> have
>> to go "outside" of the addr.arpa domain with CNAME-records and go to the
>> domain where the addr.arpa belongs to and point to the DNS-servers
>> there.
>>
>> OK, that is as far as I can get it at the moment. The problem is.... is
>> this possible with PDNS ? I think it can, but how ?
>>
>> I'm using PowerAdmin as frontend, but I think it has nothing to do with
>> it.
>>
>> Can anybode give me some words that can get me out of this problem ?
>
> Of course its possible with PowerDNS. Reversezones are just like
> "normal" Domains, they just look strange :)

Yes indeed... you name it the right way.

> It seems that the NS-Records for your Zone are missing in the Database -
> how did you define them? Can we have a dump or something else? Maybe a
> screenshot of your edit-site in PowerAdmin should be enough (edit.php).
>

It doesn't respond on the DN-records after syncronizing the DB's. CNAME's
are displayed.

Is it possible for you to make an example what entries there should be ?
192.168.1.x should be clear enough, than I can compare it here.





More information about the Pdns-users mailing list