[Pdns-users] 2.9.4 -> 2.9.8 breakage

[Gabriel Ambuehl]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Hello Damian,

Monday, June 9, 2003, 7:40:05 PM, you wrote:

>> Any comments on this?  The MASTER functionality I've pretty much
figured
>> out, but I don't know where to go with the non-working ACLs on
recursive
>> lookups...

> Okay, more testing....
> I just replaced my nameserver with 5.1-STABLE.  Recompiled the
latest pdns
> from the ports (2.9.8), and it's *still* showing this problem.

There's no such thing as 5.1-STABLE. STABLE is still the 4 branch and
5 will become the STABLE branch later this year (probably around 5.2)

> To review...
> I have recursion enabled in pdns, using an external recurser.  I
allow
> recursion from two networks.  If I do a recursive lookup from a host
outside
> of these two networks, it fails, *unless* the address is in the pdns
cache,
> then it reports back happily.

> Can anyone at least confirm that they are seeing the same behaviour
/ not
> seeing the same behaviour?

As the drive in my CURRENT box recently died (Maxtor crap it was in
case you wanna know), I currently have no CURRENT box up and running
but 4.8 behavior is of any help, I'll gladly test recursing there.

You might want to try compiling pdns yourself without ports?



Best regards,
 Gabriel

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.0.2i

iQEVAwUBPuS53MZa2WpymlDxAQHcZwf7Bpv8AIzBTCl+PtFVN2vMxRV5FsJ+l5xX
4aBuDtzqiCcOHA9sLTJwL/mDrnF99/IfYz7ccZPOnSqu9/qvRms0XE0x5D9/92g5
QCdAatdz44QFhFf9PqEvYVZg7sw1LEyLwzTNPYEixqTJfLBRTeI2CHygr2QVf7sN
cHU0zcEd2sxNKnI/RXuFeCgYMzK+GqsgiIm3vwW568kM3Zvos13Xe5la09SOmunH
6dDIhiL/lezkqmapF2bohcrCzgQMjeVtOkpjFd8xOCBtIffGWm5nDBBaINTJA56Q
5o2ZPeziUG2lrVH+7L9MnPE40xqen3dL6ciOnmXNoebCMvAII6EXVw==
=zWpL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----