[Pdns-users] 2.9.4 -> 2.9.8 breakage
gabriel_ambuehl at buz.ch
Mon Jun 9 17:46:16 UTC 2003
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Monday, June 9, 2003, 7:40:05 PM, you wrote:
>> Any comments on this? The MASTER functionality I've pretty much
>> out, but I don't know where to go with the non-working ACLs on
> Okay, more testing....
> I just replaced my nameserver with 5.1-STABLE. Recompiled the
> from the ports (2.9.8), and it's *still* showing this problem.
There's no such thing as 5.1-STABLE. STABLE is still the 4 branch and
5 will become the STABLE branch later this year (probably around 5.2)
> To review...
> I have recursion enabled in pdns, using an external recurser. I
> recursion from two networks. If I do a recursive lookup from a host
> of these two networks, it fails, *unless* the address is in the pdns
> then it reports back happily.
> Can anyone at least confirm that they are seeing the same behaviour
> seeing the same behaviour?
As the drive in my CURRENT box recently died (Maxtor crap it was in
case you wanna know), I currently have no CURRENT box up and running
but 4.8 behavior is of any help, I'll gladly test recursing there.
You might want to try compiling pdns yourself without ports?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.0.2i
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Pdns-users