[Pdns-users] PipeBackend: no remote-ip-address when AXFR?

[Leigh Porter]

How do you find performance for this? I would like to use a similar approach for a simple DNS filter so I lookup the remote IP address and then, depending upon that I'll choose the view (i.e. RPZ-style filter or not) based on that.

But I'm concerned that the database lookup will slow it down too much..

--
Leigh


-----Original Message-----
From: pdns-users-bounces at mailman.powerdns.com [mailto:pdns-users-bounces at mailman.powerdns.com] On Behalf Of Daniel Funke
Sent: 23 April 2014 15:53
To: pdns-users at mailman.powerdns.com
Subject: [Pdns-users] PipeBackend: no remote-ip-address when AXFR?

Hi all,

to get something like views in bind, I'm trying to use a PipeBackend which is asking a PostgreSQL database.

For simple queries it works fine because I get the remote-ip-address in the query and can select the depending view from my db.

But the zone transfer just comes with "AXFR    id", without the ip 
address of the client. So I've no plan what to do...

Any ideas?

Bye
Daniel

_______________________________________________
Pdns-users mailing list
Pdns-users at mailman.powerdns.com
http://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com ______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
______________________________________________________________________