[Pdns-users] DNSSEC on PowerPC64 machine

[David BERARD]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

On 07/Mar - 11:59, Peter van Dijk <peter.van.dijk at netherlabs.nl> wrote:
>| Hello David,
>| 
>| On Mar 6, 2012, at 23:50 , David BERARD wrote:
>| 
>| > No-DNSSEC request work well, and each DNSSEC request make PowerDNS crash with
>| > message :
>| > 
>| > 	signing returned: -1024
>| > 
>| > I realized the same configuration on x86_64 machine, PowerDNS reply correctly to
>| > all request with or without DNSSEC.
>| > 
>| > I also copied the working sqlite3 from the x86_64 machine to the ppc64 machine and
>| > PowerDNS crash with the same message.
>| > 
>| > I also tried another backend (MySQL) with the same issue.
>| > 
>| > Does anyone uses DNSSEC on a ppc/ppc64 without any issue ?
>| 
>| I don't know whether anyone does - I do know several bugs related to crashes and errors during signing have been fixed since the release of 3.0 (and 3.0.1 does not have those bug fixes). I would suggest building our SVN (a fresh snapshot is available at https://autotest.powerdns.com/job/powerdns-svn/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/pdns-3.1-pre.20120305.2475.tar.gz) and see if that helps. I would be happy to work with you from there if there is any trouble.

Thanks for reply, I've just build this version (3.1-pre.20120305.2475) on the ppc64, pdns-server
crash with the same message but a different value :

	signing returned: -17156

Regards,
- -- 
________________________________________________________________________________
David BERARD

contact(at)davidberard.fr
GPG|PGP KeyId 0xC8533354
GPG|PGP Key http://davidberard.fr/C8533354.gpgkey
________________________________________________________________________________
*           No electrons were harmed in the transmission of this email         *
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iEYEARECAAYFAk9XiKkACgkQOL7fhchTM1RZvwCgn6gpJrITidZecyktYzTaCrxS
WMsAn1EIcXDUAPxoLbuu7QCivwpreOm6
=8CDz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----