[Pdns-users] Number of entries can be stored in cache in pdns_recursor?

[RBK1001]

fixed. this is due to timeout of the command!

RBK1001 wrote:
> 
> Thanks, this really gives an idea on what the problem is. 
> 
> i did some changes, and seems the results are different now. but I faced
> another problem, when I tried to do a rec_control dump-cache, i got below
> error. should I open a new thread for discussion? 
> 
> prompt> rec_control dump-cache t1 
> Fatal: Unable to receive message over control channel: No such file or
> directory 
> 
> 
> any idea? 
> 
> - RBK 
> 
> James Cloos-9 wrote:
>> 
>> What Peter is asking for can easily be provided by showing the output of
>> dig(1)ing the records in question.
>> 
>> Eg, were I to run:
>> 
>>   :; dig mailman.powerdns.com mx
>> 
>> and look in the answer section, I would see:
>> 
>> ;; ANSWER SECTION:
>> mailman.powerdns.com.  86376  IN  MX  10 mailman.powerdns.com.
>> 
>> The value 86376 in that answer is the record's TTL.
>> 
>> If you were to dig one of the records which you want to cache and post
>> the answer section, you should answer his question.
>> 
>> I hope that this helps.
>> 
>> -JimC
>> -- 
>> James Cloos <cloos at jhcloos.com>         OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pdns-users mailing list
>> Pdns-users at mailman.powerdns.com
>> http://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users
>> 
>> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Number-of-entries-can-be-stored-in-cache-in-pdns_recursor--tp34004428p34046902.html
Sent from the PowerDNS mailing list archive at Nabble.com.