[Pdns-users] Difficulty changing nameservers on domain registar's site

Leen Besselink leen at consolejunkie.net
Thu Jul 2 15:37:58 UTC 2009


On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 06:15:44PM +0300, Jani Karlsson wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Your problem is with SOA DNS-record:
> The given nameservers return different SOA entries.
> 
> So either your SOA serial, data or TTL differs between servers. Or it 
> just that other server doesn't respond to SOA request that is making the 
> SOA check fail, even though the problem is not with SOA but in that the 
> nameserver isn't responding (common GoDaddy error), blaims SOA missing 
> or faulty when actually the problem is that the nameserver isn't responding.
> 
> I hope this clears things a bit.
> 

Hi SashaB,

If you want to lookup the SOA-record of a domain, you could use the 'dig'
command:

dig @nameserver domain.tld SOA

But if those are not the same, maybe the domain-zone is not a copy of the
zone on the other nameserver, which is asking for trouble if it's not just
a version difference.

> Cheers,
> 
> Jani Karlsson
> 
> 
> SashaB wrote:
> >Ken,
> >
> >I'm not sure what you mean. For example, so we didn't have to enter 
> >different NS for 50 domains, I registered a domain name specifically for 
> >use with NS (that is their sole purpose) and I've set up NS for multiple 
> >website domain names that are identical--kinda like a webhosting company 
> >does? There are four NS on two different servers at two datacenters in 
> >different parts of a region (for which I haven't mirrored or set up 
> >round-robin yet, though I intend to do so--and research shows I can on 
> >pdns). Actually, two of the NS point to the same IP address as does the 
> >one in question and several other NS point to that IP, too. All server 
> >diffent content--blogs, websites, web interfaces for pdns, web guis for 
> >various applications, webmail servers--just fine.
> >
> >This works, in part, because the actual content is served, in most 
> >cases, though not all, from an entirely different IP addresses from the 
> >NS IP addresses (and the virtual host settings on apache reflect that). 
> >Yet, we have no problem reaching any of that content, even where the NS 
> >IP address are shared with content-serving hostnames rather than 
> >dedicated only to doing NS resolution like other IP addresses. Again, 
> >domain resolution isn't only about the nameservers--it's about the hosts 
> >and host.conf files, as well as whatever backends we use, too. (There 
> >are some other factors, like resolvers, but you get my point.)
> >
> >So, as I explained, my mail/webmail NS are on different IP addresses 
> >under its domain name from the content the webmail server and mail 
> >server 'serves'. All DNS records for the domain are contained on its 
> >master server, including both NS, which point back to those IP 
> >addresses. The secondary NS has it's own master record on the server 
> >where it's located and contains only its IP address, since pdns doesn't 
> >use "pointer" records, relying instead on it's native ability to resolve 
> >properly configured DNS.
> >
> >Since I've created an "A" record for those IP addresses from which 
> >actual content is served in the DNS records on our registrar's site (and 
> >have properly configured the vhosts in apache), when we enter either our 
> >webmail server IP address or its hostname, my webmail server software 
> >admin page loads--just like it should.
> >
> >When I load up the gui interface for our mailserver under either the 
> >hostname, which is something like "mailservertype.maildomain.eu", it 
> >loads perfectly. This stuff's fairly idiot proof because apache, mysql 
> >and pdns all let you know when you've misconfigured stuff by not working 
> >right--or at all.
> >
> >Therefore, I don't know how your answer relates to my problem and it 
> >doesn't address the issue of the registrar not being able to reach the 
> >secondary NS, which is on an entirely different server and has a 
> >separate IP address. This doesn't appear, as you suggested when I posted 
> >my last question about how PDNS works differently from BIND and again in 
> >this post, as my lack of understanding DNS. I'm new to PDNS, not to DNS. 
> >I couldn't have set this system up if I didn't have DNS understanding 
> >and the registrar for my other domain names seems to have no problem 
> >adding our changed NS to their system, so, our NS configuration aren't 
> >the problem.
> >
> >If anyone else has any suggestions--especially those in the EU where 
> >this seems to be an issue--at least when I bing(.com) it, I would 
> >greatly appreciate your help.
> >
> >Sasha
> >
> >On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Kenneth Marshall <ktm at rice.edu 
> ><mailto:ktm at rice.edu>> wrote:
> >
> >    On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 09:15:03AM -0400, SashaB wrote:
> >     > Hello all,
> >     >
> >     > This is a long post with a lot of info since I thought you should
> >    know as
> >     > much as possible about these NS before (a) having to ask the obvious
> >     > questions and (b) so you can offer suggestions.
> >     >
> >     > Here's the situation. I have set up the NS for our domains (on
> >    four servers)
> >     > and nearly all resolving properly to the domains to which they
> >    point. (For
> >     > those few that are not, I have figured out and corrected the
> >    issue; now
> >     > we're waiting for the changes to propogate.)
> >     >
> >     > However, we I have a specific domain registered via a registrar
> >    in the EU
> >     > for one of our mail/webmail servers and, each time I try to
> >    change the NS
> >     > (domain 'owners' can modify their own DNS on the registrar's site
> >    similar to
> >     > (but far simpler than) GoDaddy's "Total DNS"), I get the
> >    following errors:
> >     >
> >     > ns1.maildomain.eu  --->"The given nameservers return different
> >    SOA entries."
> >     > ns2.maildomain.eu --->"Connection to server failed."
> >     >
> >     > Before providing your help, you should know the following:
> >     >
> >     > 1) The nameservers are shared by other NS, all of which have
> >    domain names
> >     > associated for their specific purposes. (For example:
> >    ns1.foodomain.net <http://ns1.foodomain.net>,
> >     > dns1.thisdomain.com <http://dns1.thisdomain.com>,
> >    ns1.maildomain.eu, etc.). I've pointed all "ns1"
> >     > domains to one IP address on each server and "ns2" are pointed to a
> >     > different IP address on each server but share the same IP address
> >    on that
> >     > server, etc.
> >     > 2) The NS for this domain are on different servers in the same
> >    region and
> >     > located in entirely different datacenters.
> >     > 2) While there is a master record for the ccTLD itself on its
> >    resident
> >     > server, I've also set up a separate master record for the NS1 so
> >    I can see
> >     > updating serial numbers for just the NS. Because I also set up, as a
> >     > supermaster, the hostname for the servers on which each of their
> >    NS has its
> >     > master record, without creating each NS as a slave on the master
> >    server for
> >     > that record, they each show on the other server as a slave and
> >    their serial
> >     > numbers (and my logs, which I've set up to view by secure
> >    webserver) show
> >     > they have been updating regularly.
> >     > 3) Websites and other applications, some with the same NS IP (but
> >    different
> >     > domain name), are resolving correctly.
> >     > 3) All NS point to IP addresses, not CNAMEs or redirects. In
> >    fact, I tend to
> >     > use IP addresses over hostnames because they resolve better if we
> >    make DNS
> >     > changes to hostnames.
> >     > 4) I 'played around' with the NS to learn how pdns works and
> >    determine how
> >     > best to set them up, especially for security and convenience. In 
> >     that
> >     > process, I found it was just easier to point the NS for all of
> >    our domains
> >     > to the same IPs on each server and use other IPs for other
> >    purposes (like
> >     > pointing a domain's webservers to). So, I changed the IP
> >    addresses for the
> >     > NS, deleted and recreated NS records, updated SOA records, etc.
> >    That may
> >     > affect the SOA entries.
> >     > 5) The NS have been live for at least 24 hours each.
> >     > 6) The NS point to different IPs from the domain's other records,
> >    like the
> >     > MX and webmail server, which have their own IP addresses. I've
> >    configured my
> >     > virtual hosts in apache accordinly (except I did not create any
> >    for the NS.)
> >     > 7) The SOA record of NS record on each server points to the
> >    appropriate IP
> >     > address and is configured, "ns1.maildomain.eu
> >     > hostmaster.masterrecordserver.com
> >    <http://hostmaster.masterrecordserver.com>". Since each is on
> >    different servers, the
> >     > "hostmaster" domain name is for that server, not the master
> >    server (ns1) of
> >     > the domain itself.
> >     > 8) I've given the registrar's IP address access to my server (via
> >     > hosts/csf.allow and the firewall) and added its network address
> >    to the
> >     > 'axfr' setting in pdns.conf. The pdns-recursor is not active on
> >    one server
> >     > (configuration issues) but is on the other. On the server with
> >    pdns-recursor
> >     > running, each master record has a corresponding "in-address.arpa"
> >    entry. I'm
> >     > still working on that for the other server. Neither server,
> >    however, is
> >     > experiencing resolution issues with the domains not associated
> >    with these in
> >     > question.
> >     >
> >     > So, that all said, I have a few questions that might be a source
> >    of some
> >     > issues:
> >     >
> >     > 1) I've taken the extra step of creating an "A" record for each
> >    NS in the
> >     > domain's DNS settings on the registrar's site as well as updating
> >    the other
> >     > records for the domain in the registrar's DNS as well, thinking
> >    that may
> >     > help. Will that affect the SOA records?
> >     > 2) Do the changes I've made to the master records, i.e., changing
> >    the IP
> >     > address of the NS several times before deciding on a final
> >    configuration,
> >     > cause such problems? (The NS for my websites, which have totally
> >    different
> >     > NS, in part, so we don't have these issues with them, have been
> >    'cast in
> >     > stone' for several weeks and haven't changed so they're resolving
> >     > correctly.)
> >     > 3) My understanding is that mysql acts as recursor when
> >    pdns-recursor. How
> >     > can I tell if the records in mysql are correct? (I've looked at
> >    the records
> >     > via Webmin but they don't contain full record entries or have IP
> >    numbers
> >     > associated, so I can't tell how accurate they are.)
> >     > 4) How does pdns-recursor and rDNS configuration affect
> >    resolution? Could
> >     > that be part of the issue?
> >     >
> >     > Finally, I've done searches online and found that others have
> >    this issue
> >     > with EU-based registrars. Ostensibly, this is to prevent NS
> >     > misconfiguration. But, I'm finding pdns is pretty good at that so
> >    I'm not
> >     > understanding the problem. But, since I have three more domains
> >    with this
> >     > registrar, I've got to so I can fix it. Please provide your
> >     > solutions-oriented assistance in trying to ressolve this issue so
> >    we can use
> >     > our own NS for our mail/webmail servers.
> >     >
> >     > If you've read this far, thank you and I look forward to your help.
> >     >
> >     > Sasha
> >
> >    Hi Sasha,
> >
> >    Thank you for the detailed description, but I think that the problem
> >    is described correctly by the error message you received from your
> >    domain registrar:
> >
> >       your nameservers have different SOA records (paraphrasing)
> >
> >    All nameservers for a domain, by definition should have and serve
> >    identical content. I think that once you fix this inconsistancy it
> >    will all work.
> >
> >    Regards,
> >    Ken
> >
> >
> >
> >------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Pdns-users mailing list
> >Pdns-users at mailman.powerdns.com
> >http://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users
> _______________________________________________
> Pdns-users mailing list
> Pdns-users at mailman.powerdns.com
> http://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users
> 
_____________________________________
New things are always on the horizon.



More information about the Pdns-users mailing list