[Pdns-users] Why prefer recursor answers over auth Authoritative answers?
sean at boran.com
Fri Feb 6 06:43:51 UTC 2009
I cannot answer the recursive query, but I'm am also designing a setup to
replace Bind with split zones. The idea was to replace bind entirely. Maybe
we should share some design ideas?
Current I have two internet ns with bind, with an an internal and external
a) Internal master:
powerdns port 53, mysql backend
recursor:127.0.0.1 for vptt & SCIS domains
b) Internet #1: Contains only Public Zones & IPs
powerdns port 53,
mysql replica of Internal master.
Adapt queries to ignore certain zones/IPS via "LIKE clause"
recursor:127.0.0.1: recursor to pdns 53 for our Internet domains, else
Internal master if source=Internal
c) Internet#2: same as Internet#1
2009/2/4 David Sparks <dave at ca.sophos.com>
> I have setup a PowerDNS installation to replace a BIND installation. We
> run a split-horizon setup in BIND that has worked for many years. Since
> PowerDNS does not support this I intend to continue to run BIND to answer
> Internet queries, and PowerDNS will answer the internal for both auth and
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Pdns-users