[Pdns-users] Supermaster & Slaves - Supermaster has to be a listed NS?

Nicholas Orr nicholas.orr at zxgen.net
Thu Mar 13 06:46:06 UTC 2008


I managed to get supermaster working again. One question though.

Does the server that is supermaster have to be listed in a NS record for the
zone being delegated to the Slave?

I was hoping I could setup
ns1 - primary - slave
ns2 - secondary - slave
ns3 - extra -slave
ns4 - supermaster

With the above, only ns1-3 would be NS records and I only edit data on ns4,
the supermaster. So this way ns4 is never known to exist at the dns/zone
level - obviously if you look in the backend you'll see it there in the


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.powerdns.com/pipermail/pdns-users/attachments/20080313/00260217/attachment.html>

More information about the Pdns-users mailing list