[Pdns-users] still more performance issues

Norbert Sendetzky norbert at linuxnetworks.de
Thu Feb 26 16:09:53 UTC 2004


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Thursday 26 February 2004 16:05, Ken Scott wrote:
> I'm using redhat 9.1, with 256 mb ram and a 233p1.
> mysql is the backend, with the pdns recursor running.
>
> Question/answer latency: 12.8ms
>
> 12.8ms is just way too much latency, I mean i old dns server was
> just windows port of Bind running on an old NT4 box. I find it hard
> to imagin that is a better setup then pdns.

12ms latency is a normal value if the answer to the question isn't 
already in cache. Keep the database and connection overhead in mind.
On the other side, I get ca. 3ms latency if the question can be 
answered out of the packet cache.

Bind loads everything in memory before answering a single question and 
that's why it also needs only 3-4ms. The downside is that it's a 
memory hog.

You have two options:
- - Either you increase the ttl values in pdns.conf drastically
- - or use the bindbackend, which does the same as BIND


Norbert

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkA+GlEACgkQxMLs5v5/7eBhmQCffjwFfE+CRLJjxNTJtq1k9rG9
KiQAn0AKKBqr/KfCxZDxloL86W3EwPON
=ZQT7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the Pdns-users mailing list