[Pdns-dev] Suggested fix for a problem with CNAME records when recursion is not available.

Vytautas Krakauskas pdns at sdf.lt
Fri Jan 6 12:53:17 CET 2012

OK, that was my mistake, I have not read the RFC thorough enough, thanks
for pointing to the right part. Everything seems to work as expected and
the suggested fix is invalid.

Sorry for the wasted time.

On 01/06/12 12:26, Posner, Sebastian wrote:
> Repeating Peter, that would simply be a misconfiguration.
> RFC 1034, Section 3.6.2: "If a CNAME RR is present at a node, no 
> other data should be present; this ensures that the data for a 
> canonical name and its aliases cannot be different. This rule also 
> insures that a cached CNAME can be used without checking with an 
> authoritative server for other RR types."

Vytautas Krakauskas

More information about the Pdns-dev mailing list