[Pdns-dev] Re: [patch] expected behaviour of loglevel - revised patch

[bert hubert]

On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 06:04:28PM +0100, Norbert Sendetzky wrote:

> The attached diff obsoletes the previous two ldapbackend patches. It
> contains:

It does not apply to current CVS, 
Hunk #1 FAILED at 32.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 78 (offset 2 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 93 (offset 2 lines).
Hunk #4 succeeded at 170 (offset 2 lines).
Hunk #5 succeeded at 180 (offset 2 lines).
Hunk #6 succeeded at 219 (offset 2 lines).
Hunk #7 succeeded at 256 (offset 2 lines).
Hunk #8 succeeded at 271 (offset 2 lines).
Hunk #9 FAILED at 335.

Furthermore, cvs has been taken offline due to security worries, can you
send me the IP address, or IP range, where you will be connecting from?

Then you can resync.

Thanks.

-- 
http://www.PowerDNS.com      Open source, database driven DNS Software 
http://lartc.org           Linux Advanced Routing & Traffic Control HOWTO