<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2838" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><SPAN class=446212408-05052006><FONT face=Arial
size=2>Hi,</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=446212408-05052006><FONT face=Arial
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=446212408-05052006><FONT face=Arial size=2>Looking at the
default table setup for PowerDNS, the type of DB is InnoDB.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=446212408-05052006><FONT face=Arial
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=446212408-05052006><FONT face=Arial size=2>What would be the
downfall, if any, be of converting the tables to MyISAM and using this type
for the DB replication. Would it be a better option?</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=446212408-05052006><FONT face=Arial
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=446212408-05052006><FONT face=Arial size=2>We will be using the
native support of PowerDNS so MySQL will manage the consistency of the changed
data between databases.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV align=left>
<DIV class=Section1 align=left><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN
class=446212408-05052006>Regards</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV class=Section1 align=left><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN
class=446212408-05052006></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV class=Section1 align=left><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN
class=446212408-05052006>Richard.</SPAN></FONT></DIV></DIV></BODY></HTML>